The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates information about carbon dioxide release in air in four different countries United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007, moreover the emission was calculated in metric tonnes.
Overall, the amount of carbon dioxide was increased in Italy and Portugal with time while in other two countries Sweden and United Kingdom able to successfully reduce the green house gas. A noticeable fact that Sweden had seen fluctuation their initial years.
The graph clearly shows that the Portugal has seen gradual growth in carbon dioxide from about 1. 5 metric ton in 1967 to just above 3. 5 metric tonnes in 1987, for next decade the climb rate was sharp and increased 2 metric tonnes in ten years, reached 5. 6 metric tonnes after the growth rate steady. However, the Italy and Sweden had same growth rate in first decade almost 2 metric tonnes and after Italy steadily increased and reached near to 8 metric tonnes in 1997 and the emission was stable for next ten years wile in Sweden dramatically show deduction in emission and reached 4. 8 metrics tonnes. The UK had seen gradual decrease from 10. 5 in 1967 to 8. 5 in 2007 metric tonnes.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to prepare people to useful members of society Others think that the purpose of education is to help people to achieve personal ambitions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8078817734 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37818309027 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 85.4736395361 43.030603864 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264204395924 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101601859543 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10035394392 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216717798779 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656950049191 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.