The depicted line graph illustrates the age classifications of people’s attendance at music concerts in one city over a five-year period starting 2010. The vertical axis units are measured in percentage.
Overall, a cursory glance at the chart is sufficient enough to make it vivid that the attendance of citizen dwellers almost in all age groups, except individuals between 55 to 64 year age group, saw an increasing trend by the end of the period. It can be observed from the chart that the highest and lowest attendance belongs to the 16-to-24-aged individuals and over 75 year age group respectively.
In 2010, 40 percent of adolescents and mid-aged individuals attended music concert; from 2010 onwards, while the participation of the 16-to-24-aged individuals (adolescents) experienced a significant rise to its highest point precisely at 70 percent, citizens between 25 to 44 year age group’s attendance witnessed an almost U-shaped-parabolic trend and it reached approximately 49 percent in 2015.
Albeit the presence of the citizen dwellers between 45 and 54 age year (52 percent) seemed over 2 folds greater than the 24-percent participation of people aged 55 to 64 in 2015, in the following years, both trends remained steadily stable and reaching their endpoints at 54% and 22% (in 2016) respectively. Only 10 percent of the over-75-year-aged-senior citizen population intended to attend music concerts in 2010, while the participation’ percentage surged to 20 percent by the end of the period.
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 93
- Some people think that newspaper are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 87
- There are more and more effective security measures in large cities to reduce the crime Does this endeavour bring more benefits than problems 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36134453782 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49653555575 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575630252101 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.85831062 43.030603864 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.285714286 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307396355802 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153548287111 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977313073325 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209687284342 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527405700312 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.2329268293 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.