More and more people want to buy clothes, cars and other items with famous brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is noticeable that there has been a trend among consumers as items from well-known labels have met a sudden surge in sale in the omnipresent. This essay is to shed light on the primary causes of this situation and outline my own perspective on this matter. On the whole, this development can initiate both benefits and drawbacks.
To begin with, the number one cause of consumers’ need for big brands’ goods is undoubtedly the social media. Over the past few years, social media has become an influential platform, which is why famous brands now seek their potential customer online rather than the traditional way of advertising. The new generation is deeply affected by influencers and key opinion leaders (KOLs), therefore, they tend to pick up their lifestyle from those. Furthermore, having been severely influenced by cinematography and celebrities’ lifestyle, young adults have developed a mindset which justify their reckless shopping: status of a person is determined by the brands one is wearing or using, the more exorbitant the price is and the more popular the item is, the higher the status that person holds.
On the one hand, with the dramatic rise in sales at the present, famous brands and labels are profiting and this has proven that consumers’ need for big brands items is more beneficial than harmful to the economy. On the other hand, whilst the economy is gaining benefits from this lifestyle, the environment is indubitably suffering from the consequences. For instance, as the need for clothes increases, the fashion industry has created “fast fashion” to provide consumers with inexpensive clothing items. As follows, it is observable from statistics that there has also been an increase in fashion waste, which derived from fast fashion due to the tawdry quality. As a result, consumers need for big labels items is also accounted for a huge carbon footprint and a massive waste which later on would translate into greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global warming.
In conclusion, this development in consumers need surely benefits the economy as sales continue to grow, albeit this also means that the waste and carbon footprint this produce is going to rise alongside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | adaline0111 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | quynhhuong656 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | duongnam1901 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 89
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 82
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his produce is going to rise alongside.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the whole, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82119403843 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3871492722 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.538461538 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136404429801 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476114037169 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500160603413 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723499345892 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466769856043 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.