With the emergence of e-mail, more often than not, many companies choose to use e-mail as the major communication method rather than discussing business problems in person. However, such a method has been questioned for its efficiency. Someone claims that classmates or colleagues communicating about a project in person instead of by e-mail will produce better work. In this regard, that opinion should be scrutinized meticulously. Were I forced to choose, I would prefer the latter point of view rather the former one, and I will elaborate my reasons in the following essay.
The first reason worth mentioning is that communicating through e-mail is much more straightforward and convenient. When a new project is launched, only to put every participant into the e-mail receiver can let them know about the detail of the project, without concerning the awkward situation about how to introduce to someone who is not familiar with. Besides, the number of available meeting rooms in a building is limited, which means sometimes it is hard to appoint a suitable place to discuss when the discussion is necessary. In the contrast, using e-mail to communicate can avoid the losses caused by no schedule for a meeting room.
Furthermore, the fact that e-mail has more digital advantages indicates that it can also be beneficial for work efficiency. Not only e-mails can store more information and files than written notebooks, but they also record the process in detail of a project automatically. Take the case of my internship last summer as an example, I was responsible for an export program when the former colleague who was in charge of it had left our company. This program had been interrupted since last winter, which means my current colleagues could not provide much detail about it. However, with the help of the information recorded in the existed e-mail, I quickly found where the program stopped and what steps should I do next. Had it not been for using e-mail to record the work process, I would spend much more time to finish this program and the profit of my company might also be affected.
A voice arises that communicating with colleagues or classmates in person can be wholesome to strengthen the relationship among them and lead to the improvement of work efficiency. Ironically, this fact does not fit everyone. We will meet uncountable colleagues and friends during studying and working, and it may cost too much time to maintain a kind relationship, which in contrast will reduce the time put into work and study, and finally leads to the drop of our grades or work outcomes. Only adding some kind words in e-mail can be enough to let the people you are working with feel the warmth. Therefore, communicating through e-mail seems a better way compared with discussing in person.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, I totally disagree with the opinion that communicating with people in person is more efficient. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people’s eyes, I firmly believe my opponents would yield after being shown to my article.
- Underwater whales produce loud noises known as songs Scientists use whale songs to study the movements for migrations of groups of whales Recently scientists discovered something unusual a single solitary whale whose song is unlike that of all other known 73
- Some people believe that smaller colleges and universities provide students with a better educational experience by for example offering more individual attention to each student Other people believe that larger colleges and universities provide a better 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone 90
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 being helpful 2 being honest 3 being well organized 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02321083172 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81540122679 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518375241779 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2736943816 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.045454545 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334594123602 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964290803183 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944435730072 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182658869109 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070382721997 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02321083172 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81540122679 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518375241779 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2736943816 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.045454545 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334594123602 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964290803183 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944435730072 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182658869109 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070382721997 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.