The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
We are all surrounded by commonplace things. Its the ignorance in ourselves that stops us from deriving a wonderful idea out of them. I completely agree with the claim because of the following reasons and illustrations.
It was around 16th century A.D. a man sitting calmly under an apple tree was looking at sky just relaxing. Suddenly an apple falls over his head and what next is all history. Everyone at that time knew thigs are supposed to fall down but noone wondered why until Sir Issac Newton discovered the concept of gravity. There are numerous such inventions and discoveries that we see yet there are only a few who can see ideas in them. Consider for example the invention of safety pin, or a paper clip. So mundane these might have sounded at that time, but today they have widespread applications
Further, some might argue that there are many such ideas, that are arcane for a layman and do not fit under the definition of "commonplace". Yes this notion is true, but for the ones who devised the idea, it could be a banal subject for them. Consider the example of theory of relativity. Indeed it is a recondite concept for many, yet for the likes of Einstein and Maxwell, the paragons in the name of electro-magnetism, it was completely a common thing.
As mentioned, earlier, it is the fog of ignorance that we need to clear, even a common man could see brilliant ideas around him. It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. Trapped in a precarious situation, even we can derive something from things around us. Take for example the cave man, who were not as advanced as the homo sapiens today, yet they invented fire and the wheel to facillitate their requirements and needs. Its the perspctive and creative one needs to adopt and simply mundane things can do magic for you.
To conclude, it can be clearly observed from the mentioned illustrations that even the most quotodian things can be a source of brilliant ideas.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-20 | Zahid6400 | 54 | view |
2024-01-09 | gayatri5323 | 80 | view |
2023-09-09 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
2023-09-08 | Murad1234 | 58 | view |
2023-09-06 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
- The function of Science is to reassure the purpose of art is to upset Therein lies the value of each 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of men and women that the society chooses its heroes or its role models 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 16
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...e all surrounded by commonplace things. Its the ignorance in ourselves that stops u...
^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...er the example of theory of relativity. Indeed it is a recondite concept for many, yet...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...cillitate their requirements and needs. Its the perspctive and creative one needs t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75510204082 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84059885613 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580174927114 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7853726845 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6111111111 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123702320111 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372785403272 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404517513938 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774377146312 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348559472938 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.