The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different are of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The given table compares the modification of people who travelled to work by bicycle among 12 different areas of the UK in the two years 2001 and 2011.
In general, it is transparent that the number of cycling commuters went up in all the mentioned areas over the 10-year period. In which, both Inner and Outer London were the two areas that had the highest numbers of individuals cycling to work in 2001. Notwithstanding, in the next 11 years, the places that saw the most considerable increases in percentage were Inner London and Brighton and Hove.
In 2001, the numbers of UK commuters travelling to work by bicycle were most noticeable in London, around 43 thousand people in Inner London and nearly 34 thousand in Outer London. After 10 years, the numbers of residents cycling to work in Inner London jumped to over 106 thousand, an increase of 144%, whereas the figure for Outer London just saw a slight rise of nearly 16 thousand people, which was the lowest percentage change among 12 areas.
Bristol and Hove was the area that witnessed the second largest change in the number of people cycling to work. The figure for this area stood at around 3 thousand in 2001 and doubled to over 6600 in the following 10 years. The other 8 areas were recorded to have under 10 thousand people travelling to work by bicycle in both years given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different are of the UK between 2001 and 2011 78
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 78
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 78
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...e travelling to work by bicycle in both years given.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 206.0 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6835443038 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48873621993 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489451476793 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 290.88556701 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9107374057 44.8134815571 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 16.8248392259 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 4.34317383033 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237983106326 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111760559081 0.0766984524023 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766028151732 0.0603063233224 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164160049783 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048860423352 0.0580467560999 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.