Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Preserving the environment is the responsibility of the government of each country.
Provide a well-supported opinion that includes details and examples to explain why you think governments should or should not be responsible for preserving the environment.
Nowadays, environmental issues are at the center of the public interest. Some assert that it is the responsibility of citizens to preserve the environment, others consider governments in charge. I, personally, believe that maintaining the natural resources is mainly upon governments for two major reasons, which will be discussed in the following essay.
To begin with, only governments have resources which are required to save the environment. Preserving the environment is a complicated process which requires a considerable amount of money, experienced specialists, and access to big data. It is impossible for ordinary people to enforce these requirements. What people can do is nothing more than precautionary actions regarding nature. Some debate that even such actions need governmental education of people. On the other hand, as mentioned above, governments have all the requisite means for preserving the environment. For instance, the Brazilian government is the unique entity in the world which can save the Amazon forest. The government has the money for it, access to the best environmentalists in the country, and historical and spatial data for saving the forest.
Secondly, just governments have the authority that is necessary for saving nature. In most environmental cases, the intervention for saving nature requires legitimacy and regulation. For instance, listing lands as national resources for extra protection, establishing a hunting prohibition in an area, passing related laws, and fining offenders of the environmental laws. If governments use their authority leverages for saving nature, they will succeed. Other efforts, including public contribution in the matter, without governmental backups are doomed to failure since they do not have enough power.
All in all, I am of the opinion that governments are responsible to save nature. This is because they have the resources and power which are the principles for preserving the environment.
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 60
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 60
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y leverages for saving nature, they will succeed. Other efforts, including public...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6610738255 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22251975557 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1583549059 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130056098685 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494945298657 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411793161608 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963456640382 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234721305232 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.