Some people say that art (painting, music, poetry) can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In many parts of the world, a school of thought believes that everybody can draw a painting, compose a piece of music or write poetry. I subscribe to this statement owning to the merits outlined below.
On the one hand, the art formed by the reality materials of every single life is suitable to the masses who have a great deal of practical knowledge. To be more specific, people who devote a large proportion of their time to working and finding the meanings of life can insert these to draw pictures in their way. Hence, living experiences and decent skills are enough to bring their life lessons to youngsters. This method is useful to express the idea and thinking of each person which will boost the development of the country to others.
On the other hand, a person who is endowed with an aptitude for art may need less time and effort to succeed in comparison with others. Working with ambitions and talents is a key to making a masterpiece in art. Additionally, a host of complex technics in drawing, composing and writing are easier to be imparted to talented artists. They can have more opportunities to create a masterpiece displayed in the museum than ordinary artists.
Finally, I concur with the statement that art is suitable for everyone. It is irrefutable that a host of well-known painters and musicians who are not born with any unique ability still have scores of achievements in the art, the art not only requires talent but also demand the constant attempt of artists. If only early artistic talents are thought to make useful works, many people with ambitions to pursue art may be ignored.
In conclusion, the merits of the art for everyone are weightier than that of the demerits. The government have an integral role in ensuring equal opportunities for both talented and non-talents artists.
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe the government is responsible for while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t owning to the merits outlined below. On the one hand, the art formed by the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... development of the country to others. On the other hand, a person who is endow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the museum than ordinary artists. Finally, I concur with the statement tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbitions to pursue art may be ignored. In conclusion, the merits of the art for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, so, still, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82108626198 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69238290007 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539936102236 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2657512015 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18563170292 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057822671014 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414496582955 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968956795013 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398720654395 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.