Today, with the development of technology, it is very easy for everybody to access to computer, this result in large number of children play computer games, which is not always good for them. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, solutions can be taken to mitigate these potential problems.
There are many problems related to children play computer games. The main issue will obviously study distraction. When kids spend a lot of their time playing games, they do not have time for learning, this will cause the decrease in academic performance. Another problem is playing games on computer is not good for children’s health. If they look at computer screen for a long time, it will adversely affect their eyes because of the green light, which is harmful for human’s health. Also, kids will not play sports or doing outdoor exercise if they keep their eyes on the computer, this will lead them to be poor in health and may have to suffer from obesity.
However, there are several actions that could be taken to solve the problems mentioned above. Firstly, it is important for parents to limit their children’s time playing computer games, if are not let to play games, they will have time to study or playing sports, etc. Secondly, parents should encourage their kids go outside for outdoor activities like cycling, soccer, badminton, … these can significantly improve children’s health. Finally, educate your kids about the risk of being addicted to computer games so that they can voluntarily stay away from those games. In short, there are a lot of things parents can do to protect their children from the negative effects from playing games on computers.
In conclusion, various measures can be implemented to tackle the problems that certain to arise as the number of children nowadays are playing computer games a lot.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In some countries around the world voting is compulsory Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting Agree or disagree
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 61
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04823151125 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5704494607 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520900321543 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0965337874 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318488374674 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135882134362 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100954619197 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236367332716 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052506304421 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.