The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps show the changes that occurred from 1967 to 2001 in Felixstone, UK.
Overall, the west part of town remained unchanged, but the other parts developed to be more modern for tourism and service.
At first, the facilities were very basic with some natural parts. North of the main road, there was a golf course in the West and one piece of farmland in the East. In the middle of them was the high street and 2 rows of shops. In the South, next to the coast were fishing facilities such as fish market, pier and marina. There were also a café and a hotel next to the trees and dunes in the West.
30 years later, the facilities transformed a lot. The West part including the golf course, the trees and the dunes were the same, but there were some new turbines in the beach. Moreover, a new car park was built for the hotel, while all the other things were removed to build the public beach and private beach. In the North, a new hotel was constructed in the old farmland. Finally, one side of shops turned into apartments.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-25 lethianhthu 78 view
2022-01-31 mad view
2021-11-19 xuanmai2501 73 view
2021-11-19 xuanmai2501 11 view
2021-11-19 xuanmai2501 78 view
Essays by user xuanmai2501 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, moreover, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38541666667 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17862784129 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7184609615 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1666666667 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0503378318291 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233256294485 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671632785791 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646215839422 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103512718426 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.