Pebbleton Village 20 years ago vs now
The diagrams illustrate the growth of Pebbleton village from 20 years ago until now. The most noticeable developments are the appearance of more accommodation as well as several community construction for the residents of the village.
As shown in the map, the film studio located in the southwest corner of the main island has been replaced by an apartment building. Furthermore, a number of houses were built in addition to the existing ones along the northern coast. Looking at the maps in more detail, we can see that a lighthouse has situated in the northwest area of the village for over 20 years; the old forts once lied next to it has been demolished to make way for a children’s playground.
At present, there is a community center added to the site between the playground and the residential area. To the south, tennis courts have been erected at the northwest cornerof the Lighthouse Lane intersection with Old Fort Road. Aside from the existed Roadbridge, the new Footbridge has been developed to link the southern island to the main island of the village. This development is a footpath that connects the school on the smaller island to the recent tennis courts. Finally, no change has been made to the playing field lying to the south of Old Fort Road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | longpham | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | tieuquynh | 11 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- Two road tunnels in an Australia city 84
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending by university students in three different countries in 2007 It shows their total average spending and their spending on various different living costs Summarise the information by selecti 73
- Table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agricultural sectors in 6 countries in 2003
- Percentage of people occupation in UK and Ashby
- Pebbleton Village 20 years ago vs now 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84862385321 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76386329707 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1846985804 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132880386127 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608581057719 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159045740374 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127776985525 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144373305768 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.