In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicle outweigh disadvantages?
In the modern day, self-driving cars become more flourishing, implying that drivers will be relegated to passenger status. Although such an innovation brings benefits to some extent, I opine that it leads to more drawbacks compared to those advantages.
Turning into detail, it is evident that unmanned cars bring various positive prospects in terms of amenity and safety. Regarding to the former, autonomous vehicles allow its owners to have spare time during the trip. According to a statistic body of Hanoi, it is the fact that its citizens usually spend 2 hours a day moving from home to work and vice versa, this duration is not going to be wasted in the automation era, which encourages people to make the most of their time to tackle private matters like broadening their horizons, namely investigating the stock market. Additionally, it is acknowledged that the vast majority of accidents are attributed to human error. Therefore, depriving them of vehicle controls helps to eliminate reckless behaviors such as intoxicated driving or road rage.
On the other hand, it is true that driverless vehicles can have few drawbacks. Specifically, using computer-based cars on a regular basis will cost a higher fee then the traditional transport due to the budget for implementation of a complicated system to maintain its performance. Indeed, it is deemed to not be a saving strategy in financial manner. Meanwhile, its sophisticated technological and software problems are inevitable. Therefore, those issues would take days to fully repair it, simultaneously interrupting in general the activity of those relying on them.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that driverless mobility models bring some improvements to people’s live, I believe that the major downside also should be prioritized above the merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-25 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | ducphanhuy98 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | thomas242 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36013986014 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1050624443 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674825174825 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.252340068 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179240794675 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542067842813 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050901432161 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102157061362 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137294308701 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36013986014 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1050624443 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674825174825 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.252340068 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179240794675 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542067842813 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050901432161 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102157061362 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137294308701 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.