The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase
the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that fossil energy is more and more being used out of control in a wide variety of fields over the world, leading to concern about detrimental environmental issues. While I agree that increasing fuel prices will handle these problems well to some extent, I opine that some drawbacks are also discernable.
To begin with, carbon-based power is the major cause of the increase of average global temperature because of the stunning acceleration of vehicles bearing internal combustion engine. Hence, raising the cost of this energy type is likely to contribute to posing the attention of people in saving their budget by carpooling, or even switching to public transports instead of personal vehicles. In turn, this policy also tackles the traffic collisions partially attributed to the high density of car traveling. As a result, it demands scientists coming up with ideas for improving renewable energies, leading to achieving sustainable development.
On the other hand, it is a negative influence on the logistic system which is an economical backbone of nation. Transport expense growth, which is directly proportional to oil price, is followed by that of other commodities, even though residents’ wage is maintained, leading to an imbalance between income and expenditure. It, in turn, reduces their living standard and quality of merchandise. Admittedly, these concerns can be curbed by imposing prices onto some specific goods in order to diminish unintentional disparity. However, intervening to the market is unsustainable, which then causes inconceivable consequence that we have to avoid.
In conclusion, it is deemed as a dilemma when we consider adjustment of energy prices, the authorities should deliberate benefit over harm before reaching the final decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about history of the house or building they live in what are reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, well, while, as for, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48375451264 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07679515151 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678700361011 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2418342086 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862447030732 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247432422214 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494018074456 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0476984751358 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579549387642 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.