Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Traffic accidents are of the most common problem in modern society which every authority try to handle utterly. While a solution most people take into consideration is to impose a strict law on drivers, I opine that traffic education would be more efficient to some extent.
To begin with, some politicians argue that it is essential to harden punishments in order to urge offenders to comply with the regulation. To be more specific, most collisions on the road are attributed to the carelessness of whom controls their vehicle, hence soft sentences, which drivers must be served after getting involved in the accident, are condemned to decrease the traffic safety. For example, after introducing 43 act by congress in Vietnam, statistic indicated that the number of drinking-driving situations descended steeply by three fourth. Hence, a given policy which officials adopted can be said to bring an expected efficacy, although it requires allocating resources to police who assures that wrongdoers must be brought to justice.
On the other hand, I suggest a solution which educates children more about traffic. It is fascinated by the prospect that it will be essential for equipping them sufficiently to become safe in the road, in turn, raising their awareness of participating in transport safely in a long run. For example, integrating laws on road traffic into curriculum as a compulsory subject encourages student to recognize the importance of obeying the laws. In fact, authorities have to scrutinize its disadvantage which does not handle the issue immediately. However, measures can be combined to tackle the very core of the problem, then the benefit obtained might be remarkable in the remote future.
In brief, besides tightening the control, I lean towards the other which dedicate to education as a skeleton of the long-term strategy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- it is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 11
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'act' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'acts'.
Suggestion: acts
...fety. For example, after introducing 43 act by congress in Vietnam, statistic indic...
^^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fourth' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fourths'.
Suggestion: fourths
...g situations descended steeply by three fourth. Hence, a given policy which officials ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in brief, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28040540541 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97455232926 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0693139015 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197501858951 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653343220179 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039952702185 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10970160759 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386136709652 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.