Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have a responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While one school of thought holds that the responsibility to protect the environment by producing less amount of packaging of products is by producers and suppliers, others say that customers should also avoid packaged products. This essay attempts to shed light on both perspectives before concluding that I am in favor of the latter notion.
On the one hand, the option of letting manufacturers and supermarkets shoulder their responsibility for limiting the amount of packaging is justifiable. Firstly, they are the only ones who can manage and adjust the outside package of each product. For example, the application of advanced technologies into the process chain in the manufacturers can help produce a large number of products with no packaging or use less plastic packaging. Secondly, the lack of awareness on the importance of having a stable ecosystem and prioritizing lucrative jobs also made companies and supermarkets need to be responsible. In particular, by using plastic packaging, manufacturers can reduce a large amount of money and do not have to spend their budget on complicated processes to produce environmentally friendly packaging.
On the other hand, there is a myriad of paramount importance as I am convinced that individuals also play an important part in the lessened consumption of over-packaged goods. One reason is that residents have a conception that over-packaged is needed to protect the products or give them a more hygienic feeling. This is a common misconception that needs to be dispelled. Another reason is that buyers can choose a variety of goods that are friendly with the environment. For example, Swedish tend to prefer using paper-packaging toothpaste, because they think it is easier for them to recycle and can use the waste of outside packages to nature.
In conclusion, it is inferable that manufacturers and supermarkets need to focus on using less packaging for their products, believing that it is more significant to change consumerism behaviors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote environments Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Governments should make laws about people s nutrition and food choice Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some companies sponsor sport and sport stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n in the manufacturers can help produce a large number of products with no packaging or use less ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3596214511 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27773459412 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7088060793 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252320096796 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085285464848 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538067106545 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149461486149 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345530785174 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.