Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that it is beneficial for children to read stories through books rather than spend too much time watching TV and playing online games. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I believe that virtual games or TV programs have their values for young children.
On the one hand, it is better to encourage children to read stories from books. Firstly, a regular habit of stories at bedtime can reinforce the love between parents and children by spending most of the time together in shared activities. Secondly, unlike virtual means, through stories read by books, children can imagine the story's context in their ways, which provides for them a wonderful place to nurture their souls and mentality. For example, by hearing stories such as Little Red Riding Hood, they can imagine that they are the girl in the story and have an amazing expedition to save their grandparents from the dangerous wolf.
On the other hand, there are myriads of compelling reasons as I am convinced that it is of paramount importance to play games or watch TV. In terms of playing games, it is a great way to excite the sense of children. For instance, thanks to the technology with cutting-edge graphic designs and sound effects that appeared on games, children can enjoy the live sound, and by the click on the screen, they can be exposed to numerous actual characters. On the side of the TV programs, by being a targeted audience of numerous animation companies, children can take advantage of a large number of amazing shows to gain expertise in any field or learn new knowledge. One of the most successful sitcoms is Phineas and Ferb, that provides children a wonderful childhood with many virtual friends and is exciting whenever seeing the character complete their missions.
In conclusion, although I believe stories can be a tool to enhance family love and promote children’s imagination, I would stand on the view that the value of playing and watching TV or games may let children complete their senses and be exciting to learn new things through digital platforms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have a responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...mpanies, children can take advantage of a large number of amazing shows to gain expertise in any ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95211267606 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62506496646 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3091594013 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5833333333 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281237445539 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11485561235 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711479071054 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188244424918 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645552080698 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.