The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been an opinion that it would be optimum for a single government to take control of all nations in the world. By this, it does bring back incredibly brilliant merits but the demerits following after that are also prominent features simultaneously.
To begin with, a single government is able to perpetuate a homogenous trend of developing worldwide. In detail, being governed by the same authority with the same policies, all regions can retain the stability in evolving, particularly in economy, medication, education, and science. Another upside from this cosmopolitan governance scheme is that the administration can enact their protective plans to thoroughly solve such notable issues such as climate change and health problems. For instance, if human society were actually governed by a single authority, climate change would be resolved efficiently as there are still nations which have not paid much attention to this global phenomenon.
On the other hand, this theory does have its downsides. First of all, following the similar growth trend is the indistinguishable culture since hundreds of countries are considered one nation in this hypothesis. As a result, the diverse range in the cultural and spiritual aspects is limited. Moreover, to control the whole world requires more than just effort and intelligence. The global administration would find it almost impossible to operate and lead over seven billion natives. This can result in turning the whole world into chaos as the government is not able to have a close supervision in every corner of their ‘country’.
To conclude, while the advantages brought back by this proposition are notably valuable, it is undisputed that its disadvantages also deserve much attention. From my perspective, I strongly believe the drawbacks far outweigh its benefits since governing all regions in the world is an unworkable task.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | dinhphuonglinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | eyraen | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | tahmeed1993 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | minhpn | 87 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- More companies have open working areas without walls and barriers in their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 55
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso prominent features simultaneously. To begin with, a single government is ab...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h attention to this global phenomenon. On the other hand, this theory does have...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in every corner of their ‘country’. To conclude, while the advantages brough...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41750841751 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05133368162 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2668162443 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309730891105 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913591388651 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589652455044 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17195462821 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248218842976 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.