The graph below shows the number of doctors (per 1000 people) in Cuba and US from 1975 to 2015
The line graph compares two countries (Cuba and The US) in terms of the rate of physicians per 1000 inhabitants over a 40-year period starting from 1975.
Overall, the physician density of Cuba experienced a dramatic increase over the period in question while that of the US witnessed a slight rise. The rate of physicians of Cuba was generally higher than the US, except for the first few years of the period.
In 1975, one out of 1000 people in Cuba was medical doctor, which was a bit lower than rate of doctors in the US (around 1.2). Cuban figure rose slightly to overtake that of the US seven years later before climbing dramatically to below 8 in the final year.
In contrast, the figure for the US increased marginally from the beginning of the period to below 3 in 2005 and then dropped to approximately 2.5 in 2010. In the last five years, it rose slightly, reaching almost 2.7 in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-04 | thanhlan0201 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | thanhlan0201 | 67 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this. 78
- Some people believe that developing countries should concentrate on improving industrial skills whereas others argue that these countries should promote education first Discuss the both viewpoints and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays social media should include more good news in their publications Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do it 73
- Nowadays most people are not as and active as they were in the past What are the main causes of this solution Suggest some possible solutions 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56790123457 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51230776202 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3254432344 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331507147175 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144299668708 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891556319537 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191863129754 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076171775985 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.