The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. Write a 150-word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares major financial supports received by international students in the Usa between two periods 2003/04 and 2013/14
Overall, the number of students in total was seen with a sharp increase over the given years. Also, an upward trend was witnessed in all types of funding, except for other sources
In 2003/04, out of total 572 509 overseas students, 67% of them were supported by themselves or their families with 385 543 students. Funding from US college or university was received by 134 015 stusents which comprised only 23% of total. Foreign government or university, current employer and other sources supported no more than 30 000 students each, which were not over 5% of the total
In 2013/14, personal and family still remained as the main financial source with 574 129 students, accounting for 65% of total 886 052 students. Remarkably, while there was a highest change of 390% in students supported by current employer, only -14% was seen in the figure of other sources. With exceptions of Foreign Government or university and current employer, the remaing funing sources were witnessed with 2-4% declines in their proportions of total
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 67
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 69
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19576719577 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55991718673 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0965095497 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.666666667 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172877839633 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893894964278 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525227615756 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12138812389 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475992952116 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.