As major cities in the world are growing today, so do their problems. What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth? How problems might be solved?
Large metropolises have been shown with speedy developments recently, bringing new sets of issues along with it, which are tremendous especially for young adolescents staying in these places. Possibily, these people may have to deal with a host of challenges related to the environment and career prospects, which might only be tackled by greater attention to the rural areas from both governments and entreupreneurs
Living in a fast-growing land can pose some threats to one’s health and future due to the intense pollution and high competitiveness in job application. To provide enough materials for their industries, many cities do not mind exploiting their natural resources as well as a huge amount of energy is needed to run thousands of factories and buldings, which may lead to more natural disasters and pollition, directly endagering the inhabitants. Also, with the increasing number of migrants flocking to the urban areas every year for higher living standards, this may lower the employment chance of young people living in the cities since they have to compete with more and more people to land a decent job
Those problems, however, could be avoided if the authorities and companies paid more attention to the villages and balance the employment rates between cities and the countrysides. The labor forces in the rural areas are often looked down on due to their minimal salary and living standards, causing villagers to migrate to big cities for more well-paid occupations. As a result, if villages are more prioritized and granted equal career prospects and income, fewer people will have to move to the urban areas, thus, slowing the rising pace of cities. For instance, the Vietnamese government has encouraged more people to start up businesses in villages in order to generate more jobs for the people there by giving financial aid for them
To conclude, although living in metropolitan areas can be life-changing, this also brings many shortcomings to the young adolescents living in those places regarding their healths and future careers. Nonetheless, this can be prevented if more governments and bussinesses thoroughly take rural areas into consideration
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | vanhhoang | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- The line graph shows TV news viewing figures over a one year period Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3083573487 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93186559369 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.810106878 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 230.25 106.682146367 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.375 20.7667163134 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.375 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181486552069 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794255804247 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407367841068 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106321536062 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372859592469 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 13.0946893788 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.41 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.