The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph contrasting the rate of New Zealand population during a 50-year period.
It is perceptible that the percentage of people in the age group of 0 to 14 and 38 to 45 leaped over the years, while the opposite was true for the 25 to 37-year-olds and the over-65s.
The two oldest age groups share a similar pattern in the proportion over the years shown. Starting at 25%, the rate of those aged 38 to 45 surged exponentially to its zenith of 48% in 1990 before moderating by 8% in the last year. Meanwhile, that of the oldest age group swelled to 70% from 60% within the first 40 years, which was followed by a diminution to its original figure in 2000.
When it comes to the other two age ranges, the population of the under-18s diminished negligibly in the vicinity of 5% during a 40-year period before soaring to 10% in the 2000s. In the interim, 20% was recorded as the rate of people who were between 25 and 37 years old in the beginning of the course. It escalated 5% a decade later and thereafter contracted 15% in the end of the 20th century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-12 | Tram Le | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-06 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | kdytrn | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | phuonganhphamtran | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Rajan wahla | 67 | view |
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59828789783 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0685111974 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065646347072 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339205385766 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622950351402 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627370766386 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769061725843 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.