The table below shows the weight of people in a particular country from 1999 to 2009.
The table depicts the proportion of the weight of men and women in one nation in three years: 1999, 2004 and 2009.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that most men and women maintained a healthy lifestyle and were at a normal weight. From 1999 to 2009, while the numbers of underweight men and women increased slightly, the figure for overweight people witnessed an opposite trend, with the number of women growing marginally and that of men decreasing significantly.
In 1999, 49% of women were normal-weight, followed by the proportion of underweight women, at 27%. In the case of male weight, a quite similar phenomenon was observed. However, the units were smaller, with 41% at a normal weight and 22% underweight. Only a minority of women were overweight, at 18% of them, less than nearly three times the number of normal-weight women. Conversely, 30% of men were overweight, 9% more than the one in the underweight section.
The proportion of skinny women rose gently by 2% in each category, to 29% in 2004. Nevertheless, in 2009, the proportion of thin women will decline marginally to 28%. On the contrary, the number of underweight men experienced a 2% fall trend, then recovered and increased by 3% in 2009. Similar to the underweight trend, the overweight females and males accounted for a smaller proportion, with 21% and 23%, respectively, in 2004, and both figures then decreased to 19% each in 2009. It can be seen that the figures for normal-weight women and men underwent a growth trend, with women rising slightly by 2% to 51%, while men saw a dramatic rise, from 41% in 2004 to 48% in 2004, before both falling to 47% each in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Thu Thuy_02 | view | |
| 2022-12-01 | lucluc | view | |
| 2022-06-16 | nttn24905_vkdekutsuki | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | adamneyul | 75 | view |
- Some people think that the government should provide free public libraries in every town while others think think this is a waste of money because people can get access to information on the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People in the community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, nevertheless, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81754385965 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88348477658 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480701754386 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 3.36585365854 446% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4485741809 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151983480987 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658636636148 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547899180819 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127406251794 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538068813507 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, nevertheless, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81754385965 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88348477658 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480701754386 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 3.36585365854 446% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4485741809 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151983480987 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658636636148 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547899180819 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127406251794 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538068813507 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.