The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The pie charts compare the percentage of fuel and power produced from different resources in a particular country between 1985 and 2003.
Overview, it is noticeable that the highest percentage in two years was the energy from gasoline. In contrast, the figure for hydrogen and other renewable energy were the lowest. In addition, there were an upward trend in the percentage of energy from coal, gas, and other renewables between the two years, while the proportion of energy from oil and nuclear tends to decrease.
In terms of the energy from oil and nuclear power, the figures for these energies were the highest percentages, at 52% and 22%, respectively, in 1985. In contrast, in 2003, both these energies decreased significantly, to 39% and 23%, respectively.
As for the energy from natural gas, coal, and hydrogen, with other renewable energy sources, in 1985, the percentage of energy from natural gas and coal were at 13% and 8%, respectively, and in 2003, these energies increased substantially to 23% and 22%, respectively. In contrast, the figure for other renewable energy increased moderately from 1% in 1985 to 4% in 2003. Furthermore, the hydrogen energy source kept the percentage constant at 4% in both years.
- The graph below shows coffee production in four different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football However others think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below shows how much money a single person and a couple in Australia need for a comfortable lifestyle after they retire 76
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The charts show information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...m oil and nuclear tends to decrease. In terms of the energy from oil and nuclea...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... at 52% and 22%, respectively, in 1985. In contrast, in 2003, both these energies ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15422885572 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8852032703 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467661691542 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7640185534 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317947909017 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154178911817 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103092730546 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233959607814 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100994200176 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.