The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture illustrates the production of carbonated drinks.
It is noticeable that there are 5 main stages in the manufacture of carbonated drinks beginning with water cleaning and ending with packaging.
Looking at the process in more detail, we can see that at the first stage, raw water is filtered and then put into a water softener prior to being added chemicals. After that, it is pumped into an electric heater and then goes through a cooling pile. Next, the liquid is put into a machine where carbon dioxide is added to turn the liquid into carbonated water.
At the next step of the production, the carbonated water is put into mixing tanks to mix with various coloring, syrup, and flavors and then goes through a filter again to remove solids. The resulting liquid is filled into bottles or cans and then packed into boxes. Finally, the finished products are transported to the supermarket, ready to be sold.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The maps below show the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87974683544 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55436796602 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9313054292 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736214966539 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357772246727 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370204713927 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565411797167 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290570159307 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.