Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree?
It is partially agreed that employers have to rely on good qualities personally over skills and experiences in order to opt candidates for a job. Furthermore, this is true because well attitudes are a long-term asset for some companies.
First and foremost, it is believed that personal qualities are more needed to select person to be in an occupation as a future infestation than professional qualifications by employers in some corporations. This is because if people possess positive characteristics, they will bring a creative mindset into work environment, so that managers consider hiring them to develop firm’s track record. For instance, Ellen Musk may prefer interviewers having a positive mental attitude to them certified bachelor and master degree since those qualified higher education have a tendency to be arrogant and in ill-skill level, having no creativity to make a lucrative gain for SpaceX.
However, instead of individual’s qualities, it is also a truth that high qualifications and experiences are more required to filter applicants. This is caused by when they obtain advanced skills and certifications, corporations do not organize to train them, reducing training cost, and it can save the amount of income from businesses. For example, Shoppe, the biggest e-commerce in Indonesia, accepted fresh graduates applying data engineer position with 1-year experience and coding certificates last year, and this was an immense benefit for this company due to saving millions of rupiahs due to not conducting a training session to introduce the new employees about working tasks.
In conclusion, it is agreed that not only personal manner is needed by managers to hire applicants, but also experiences and qualifications since these two aspects is to advance firms. Where possible, employers should balance the proportion of both aforementioned aspect to choose new employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | Chinkiarora | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | Chinkiarora | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | prathamp114 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 84
- The graph below shows the top priorities by business companies in the USA in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002 89
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51535836177 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18006698176 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655290102389 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1013679763 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.6 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245435523276 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938459165181 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719912304165 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147330443342 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047881109826 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.