Not all family members are having meals together in everyday bases. Why? Positive or negative?
Globally, an increasing number of people are no longer eating with their family for every meal. In my point of view, the primary reason for this phenomenon is the ever-busy lifestyle that people have, and it is totally a detrimental trend.
People have no choice but to have meals separately with their children or parents as they have a hectic life. In modern society where there are various roles in a family, including students and full-time employees, people have to lead a different routine over a day. It is inconvenient and unrealistic for people who have day and night shifts to have meals together every day since some of them may need to make a huge compromise by sacrificing their resting time. Thus, family members prefer to have meals alone or with their colleagues.
Some people may think it is a positive development because they can decide when and what to have when it comes to meals without considering relatives’ preferences. However, family members will become alienated from each other as they will lose valuable time and opportunities for communication. Considering the fast-paced lifestyle mentioned above, mealtime has been the only hours that some people have to interact with family during the day, talking about things happening and expressing care and love. Having meals without their children or parents means depriving the chance to boost the bond among the family.
Moreover, it is negative for the health of the younger generation if guardians are unable to eat with them. Without proper supervision from eating tother, children are partial to have fast food which is delicious but unhealthy without the nutrients needed for their growth. Young people may eat instant food since they are busy with study and work, having no time to cook for themselves. Thus, it is possible that the next generations have no well-rounded nutrition intakes and may become mal-nutritious when they are not able to have meals with senior family members on a daily basis.
In conclusion, I think that the stressed study and work life is the key reason why some families do not have meals together daily, and I believe this is absolutely bad for people in terms of relationship and health despite its convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 89
- some people think that imprisonment is not the best way to prevent crimes Others however believe that providing offenders with education and training is less effective than putting them in prison Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 78
- 8 The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it is totally a detrimental trend. People have no choice but to have meals ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05135135135 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67318475372 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3074747986 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25804672727 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997050024489 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602577344027 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154628234964 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429262912339 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.