More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?
These days, an increasing number of people are moving to urban areas in the hope of a higher living standard, but city life can possess a number of drawbacks. This essay will discuss the problems of living in metropolis areas and suggest how governments can contribute to improving the quality of life for everyone.
There is no doubt that urban life presents a set of issues. The first problem that exists within urban life is overcrowding. The high population density in cities often leads to a shortage of food and accommodation, pushing some poor people to live in slums and causing great social disparities. In addition, the unsanitary life in slums may lead to an outbreak of diseases, posing a grave health threat to city dwellers. Another issue of urban areas is the stressful and unhealthy life. In addition to bothersome traffic congestions and incessant roar of trucks and vehicles, city residents also have to cope with toxic emissions from industrial zones and exhaust fumes from motor vehicles which may cause a number of health problems such as chronic bronchitis, lung cancer and heart diseases.
However, there are some solutions that governments can apply to raise the quality of life in cities. To begin with, more tree-planting schemes and bicycle-sharing programmes should be launched to reduce pollution and improve the air quality. Governments should also restrict private car use and impose bans on heavy diesel vehicles. More importantly, they should invest more in housing and essential facilities, as well as raise funds to support deprived people. This will ensure that everyone can have access to important utilities and can narrow the gap between the rich and the poor.
To conclude, urban life can have some drawbacks including overpopulation and pollution. To solve these problems, it is of important that governments should launch more environmental-friendly programmes, restrict heavily-polluting vehicles and make more investment in essential facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | Anh1405 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-04 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | NgocNhan.Englishteacher | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | mochimochi | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | mochimochi | 89 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to to this 89
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- Some believe that students should be taught how to compete while others say that they should be taught to cooperate What is your opinion 78
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
- Some people think that university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39682539683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05147903703 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6710268729 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392713854082 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123970010839 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590338889332 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227287000325 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368728242091 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.