The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages).
The table illustrates how many international tourists arrived in different countries and the proportion change in these numbers between 2009 and 2010.
In general, France was the most favorite place for tourists but there was no change in the number of foreign tourists who traveled here while the highest percentage increase was in Germany.
In 2009 and 2010, the number of people who visited France was 76 thousand, compared with the figure for the USA was 66 thousand in 2009, rising to 67
thousand in 2010. This number was significantly higher than tourist arrivals in Spain and the UK. Both of these countries received 55 thousand international visitors by 2009 and experienced a slight increase to 56 and 57 thousand respectively in the following year.
There was also a growth in the number of foreign tourists traveling to the remaining countries except for Hong Kong. To be more specific, by 2009, there were 44 thousand people who visited Italy, rising to 45 thousand in the next year. Meanwhile, the numbers were rather lower, international tourists arrivals in Turkey, China, and Germany witnessed a considerable increase over this period. By contrast, the figure for Hong Kong declined from 10 to 9 thousand
between 2 years.
All these countries experienced sustainable growth over the period except for France, where there was no change, and Hong Kong where the figure decreased 11% between 2 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | songuyen14 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | phg_phg | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-09 | pris | 80 | view |
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 67
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 73
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 73
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...SA was 66 thousand in 2009, rising to 67 thousand in 2010. This number was signif...
^^^
Line 8, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hong Kong declined from 10 to 9 thousand between 2 years. All these countries...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16379310345 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7469445787 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1114940151 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265219052919 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118533697069 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11493468511 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167227179168 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130028548092 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.