Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country,
while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is asserted by some people that conducting an international sports event will benefit the host country whereas critics say that those events would be a waste of budget and should be better spent. Despite the evident merits it brings to the society, I would concur with the latter notion for the profound drawbacks of large sport festivals.
For one thing, such events provide opportunities for the country to enhance the image of cultural identity and bolster economic prosperity. From the cultural perspective, sports aspirants as well as domestic visitors will gather to join in the dynamic environment in which high sporting spirit is promoted. Hence, this is advantageous for the locals to uphold their value through advertising and selling traditional commodities and cuisines. Consequently, the tourism industry will grow significantly owing to the increasing demand for traveling to the country where the event is held and businesses could boost sales when people are willing to pay more for recreational activities on such occasions.
For another, the shortcomings are subtle which wield perennial negative influence on the host nation in the long run. Firstly, the cost for maintaining sport amenities is substantial in comparison with the profit derived from ticketing. The investment in sports facilities aimed at professional athletes is a financial constraint and a pressing problem for the authorities given the vast amount of the equipment are only used temporarily. The disparities in the turnover often accompany offshore investment for labor cost to construct stadiums and build other facilities considered as national loans, which the chosen country will have to endure for years later. Furthermore, with the massive numbers of tourists across the globe combined in a region, this could give rise to potential infectious diseases which exert adverse health impacts on the public. For instance, the proportion of Covid-19 patients has risen significantly in Korea after the Olympic games ended. This will weigh more on the medical system of the host when the pandemics are outbroke due to the uncontrolled number of spectators assembling in one particular place and provoke the spread of diseases.
To conclude, regardless of the existing economical and cultural benefits, I still hold the opinion that those could be facilitated by other ways whereas the downsides are more considerable requiring additional attention to be resolved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before What does 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the main benefit of greater international cooperation is the environment of protection However others believe that the main benefit is the world of business Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49606299213 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93311284885 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603674540682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.939678728 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2142857143 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1989998502 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620467021917 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597692632674 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11700988176 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752332795388 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49606299213 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93311284885 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603674540682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.939678728 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2142857143 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1989998502 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620467021917 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597692632674 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11700988176 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752332795388 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.