Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many are of the view that individuals should not be involved in a secure job for life. Others say that remaining in the same occupation throughout the employment period whether they are self-employed or being hired generates values for themselves and the society as a whole. I would concur with the former on the grounds of personal development and benefits in the long run.
On the one hand, the option to maintain the current status could be explained by several reasons, chief of which is related to the merits in terms of both relationships between colleagues and financial security for senior positions. Staff who devote the entire worklife to a company witness significant changes in the process of recruitment. The bonds between those who choose to stay and overcome suffering during the progress of business are strengthened and closer than ever and this reason is owing to human fundamental need of mental well-being and socializing. With regards to the remuneration packages offered for senior staff, the financial advantages which they derive from their contribution to the company and thus for their experience are undoubtedly tremendous. This group often holds management and key positions of the company so their insurances are also really well.
On the other hand, I fervently believe that alternating between occupations could profoundly bring ample opportunities for individuals to develop and sharpen skills in many aspects. While integrating an alien environment, workers are able to cultivate social skills such as communication, presentation and exchanging professions and ideas in different contexts. Furthermore, they may encounter different thinking from diverse perspectives and visions, from peers to managers, which could foster critical thinking and broaden their horizon. Both of the aforementioned advantages will result in a dynamic working environment for staff and promote further co-operations, which is in turn beneficial to individuals even when they leave the company. The learnt implications from the previous job could be useful in the upcoming one as long as they could optimize the use of their skill set and seize the opportunities to be the outstandings.
To conclude, although perpetuating the chosen career may be secured in certain aspects, I believe the option to change is more reasonable to nurture the internal qualities of a person at the best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | Master Panda | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | cynnie.chan | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Some countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees Why are these laws introduced Do you think they are a positive or negative development 84
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 89
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before Why does t 11
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, really, so, then, thus, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41866666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06831955456 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8484856985 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.142857143 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216592161035 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718606118076 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725991998927 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117827954655 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662654974823 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.