Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether in the entire life, a worker should work for only one company or distinct companies. In my own mindset, I extremely support people to do in one organization although there seem to be some drawbacks existing in light of some radiation reasons.
Admittedly, working for myriad companies has advantages with the experience as well as relationships. The more jobs a person do , the more experienced he is. It is easy to understand that each job contains its own skills and required level so that the person reaching all of these may be all-purpose. Furthermore, an all purpose worker not only can be capable of applying all the life experience in myriad fields but also easily help other people solve difficult problems.Second, you can make friends with many people. Conspicuously, accessing in different working environments make you be more sociable because of the large number of collages from EACH company. Hence, these relationships help you in private life such as lending you money, advising you some jobs when you are unemployed.
On the other hand, notwithstanding these aforementioned advantages of multi-job worker upsides, the single one's override with the salary and productivity. When you do a job for many years, you will get used to it. People accumulate experience each time when there job is concerned, they realize the mistakes the make and try hard to fix them. So time by times it becomes huge like a dictionary, and they will be more and more productive in that job. Moreover, their salary is higher by years. Their contribution to the organization is impossible to negate, the money given to them conspicuously leap each year. That amount of money can be extremely useful for whole life afterward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- The maps give information about a university sports court 67
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that a home country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r distinct companies. In my own mindset, I extremely support people to do in one ...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...relationships. The more jobs a person do , the more experienced he is. It is easy ...
^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...p other people solve difficult problems.Second, you can make friends with many people....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of money can be extremely useful for whole life afterward.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04152249135 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01088196812 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7059528723 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225851146673 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738491432857 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053033827987 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168460221857 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558182158392 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.