In the contemporary world, people have a tendency to ignore the significance of family meals. From my perspective, I firmly believe that this development has negative impacts on the affectionate link among family members and there are several reasons related to this outstanding phenomenon.
First and foremost, one major cause of this trend is the conflict in time management among family members. Parents always have hectic schedules and due to the burdens of living quality and financial supports for their offspring, several adults entirely concentrate on their full-time job rather than spend their valuable time cooking and enjoying meals with other family members. Take people who work in some medical sectors as an example, they often have nightshifts, which means that their working schedules are not similar to others, consequently, they cannot involve in family meals.
Secondly, another reason for this phenomenon is the meaning of current family meals is not equivalent in comparison with the previous generations. In the past, meals are considered as periods that family members can gather and share everything occurring during the whole day together with the purpose to enhance the bonding among family members. However, nowadays, meals seem to be not precious things and modern people do not highly appreciate the value of it, so they tend to break the habit of eating meals with their family to take their extra time to complete other tasks instead.
In conclusion, I still maintain my original viewpoint that the ignorance of family meals is a negative development because of several reasons such as the heavy workload and the meaning of family meals is faded away.
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why does this happen Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Nowadays online shopping becomes more popular than in store shopping Is it a positive or negative development Give your reasons and examples 70
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- The process below shows how to make dough for a pizza Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27881040892 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64526811008 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.154108938 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.777777778 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8888888889 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211067880644 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977736813532 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653814845242 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145502354981 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517060757192 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.