Without any doubt, society is divided into two groups as per the distinct mindset of different people. Therefore, this has become a debate able issue whether youngsters should spend their leisure time for good deeds without payment which is beneficial for themselves as well as to the public. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favor. First of all, to individuals doing charge less activities would help excel in productivity. This is because, this helps to motor skills to be determined, rewarding themselves. The second point is, being willing to do activities develops to confront difficulties. To exemplify promotes collaboration with different kinds of people and understanding how to deal with life cautiously. As a consequence, aid to build up work things out strides to mound up a good behavior to cope with trial and errors despite getting worth in doing jobs which could be added credit for their curricular application.
Moving towards the second argument of this debate, the first point of this issue is that towards the public, those who are performing public cleaning activities are role models to the upcoming adolescents. For instance, if a teen takes part in cleaning she or he would realize the importance of public hygiene and cleanliness. Apart from this, teenagers learn how to function in a working environment. As a result, students would have prior experience of working before actually joining their jobs and therefore be ready for the future.
In conclusion, according to my perspective, I concur that, although, irrespective of wages social works are advantageous for youngsters and to the public.
- Some people think that the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead 78
- task 2 Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Write about the following topic Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve the problem Give reasons for your answer and 56
- Having a salaried job is better than being self employed To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Governments and companies should work together to reverse environmental damage rather than individuals responsible for that to what extent do you agree or disagree and relevant examples 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun activities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rst of all, to individuals doing charge less activities would help excel in producti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15463917526 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89346670911 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1040181024 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21029390872 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689117500296 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428824978131 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103776358569 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545716657519 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.