Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper

It is often seen nowadays, most communities use digital publication and there is a drop in conventional book readers. This trend has got its own benefits such as easy portability, as well as drawbacks such as health problems.

There are two major benefits of the use of e-books. To begin with, it helps to decrease the number of publication society carry with them. To be more clear in this modern era, most nation carries advanced cell phones and tablets, where people can have all their material in one place and can also create e-notes, thus decreasing the number of physical text drastically. Secondly, it can also help to reduce the cutting of trees and environmental pollution. For instance, as the paper will not be required for the manufacture of the edition, deforestation will be avoided and it will have a positive impact on the global environmental crisis.

However, there are two distinct disadvantages. Most importantly is an addiction to mobile phones and the internet. One clear example is that the population can resort to these devices as access to social media sites and for gaming competition, thereby distracting them from their target. The second point to be considered here is a hefty price that the nation will pay in long term and that would be health issues. To illustrate, the crowd are bound to have problem with their eyesight due to constantly looking at the screen for a prolonged time. In addition, the convenience of easy transportation while reading can give rise to posture-related problems such as neck pain and backache.

To conclude, considering the above explanations it is clear that the practice of reading e-books has got its pros and cons which are not negotiable.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opulation can resort to these devices as access to social media sites and for gam...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0034965035 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90681434927 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.60753352 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969979779222 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314261959491 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03753311831 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673948066225 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389826421419 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.