Scientist research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, manifold scientific research has drawn great attention from both the public as well as the government. While some advocate that those tests and examinations should be conducted by private corporations, others believe that it should be the responsibility of the state to control those. From my point of view, although the former idea is, to some extent, justifiable, I am of the opinion that the government should carry out scientific research.
Admittedly, having companies investing in scientific research can reduce the financial burden from the state budget. As the governments have a myriad of problems to deal with, ranging from the healthcare system to the matter of the sovereignty of the country and the like, they may not have enough financial backup to cater to scientific tests. By contrast, corporations only need to focus on the research, not to mention the fact that they gain great revenues from their business. As a result, they are financially capable of carrying out those research with stronger support.
However, there are numerous reasons why I believe the power and control of the government over scientific research is more ideal. The first thing to notice is that private corporations may manipulate the results of the research to gain more revenues. For example, some rice enterprises in Vietnam blinded consumers’ eyes about their artificially-created minerals in their produce, which was erroneous, in a bid to maximize their profits. Moreover, only when the government is responsible for scientific research can they prioritize what is necessary and vital to the development of the nation. They can focus solely on the project that is worth allocating fundings to and can foster the nation without being tempted to break into the market or gain a competitive edge. Accordingly, the country and people can take full use of those research.
In conclusion, while there are certain benefits of letting private corporations have control over scientific research, I reckon it is more plausible for the government to carry out those tests as the study can be scrutinized more appropriately by its main goal as well as the nation can merit more beneficial examinations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | jenifer Le | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | jenifer Le | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 90
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 11
- The maps below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...wn great attention from both the public as well as the government. While some advocate tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25633802817 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00769890907 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523943661972 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0739765045 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221311537531 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081546335218 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568181000399 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149260200289 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505807419056 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.