Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?
In recent years, a number of multiracial cities are growing up, which is a great thing for the world, in developed nations such as the USA or China. However, this trend could cause various problems due to the different cultures and etiquette which require the authorities to deal with effectively to create harmonious areas for people to live in. With the aim to create a better place for the citizen, certain measures will be suggested in this essay.
Firstly, education is of great importance, especially history. If people understand and respect each other cultures, it would probably reduce the friction of integration. Thus, various cultural and historical subjects should be added to the education system. For example, providing free foreign languages courses at local communities. This would help people have a better connection and communication, leading to a friendly and cordial neighborhood or city.
Secondly, city planning is another solution. Singapore, a great example in this area, has arranged the migrant to live interleaved with the ingenious. This kind of arrangement would prevent the establishment of racial neighborhood where there is only one type of nationality. Therefore, the barrier between races is demolished and people would have the opportunity to get to know about each other.
Finally, equity in policies and propagandas. People could only feel at ease and live with others if only they are treated equally by the systems. Furthermore, propaganda such as “No room for racism” in the UK would certainly support the minority in the communities.
In conclusion, educating the people about other cultural, arranging households and supporting the minority could be helpful in order to maintain a cordial and conflict-free city.
- individuals can do nothing to change society Any new developments can only be brought about by governments and large institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph below shows the number of people in Great Britain living alone by age from 1996 to 2012 54
- The graph shows the life expectancy of people living in Asian regions from 1950 predicts life expectancy until 2300 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- to some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree what other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43115942029 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97211670965 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.219259379 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133066487755 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406094523585 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372461107348 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733426024677 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189387002065 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.