The given bar charts demonstrate the ratio between men and women who ranked at top marks in 1960 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that scientific subjects were the strengths of male students, whereas female learners had a tendency to better at art-related majors. Furthermore, humanities gained more attention from both genders over examined years.
In 1960, about 30% of the total Science registers were males, which was threefold that of female learners. As for Mathematics, the gap between the two sexes was bigger, in which the proportion of female group only accounted for one-sixth in comparison with the opposite gender. Over a 4-decade period, the trend remained unchanged except for the changes in percentage regarding each gender. The year 2000 witnessed significant decreases in the proportion of male students who enroll in Science and Math classes to 20% and 18%, respectively. In contrast, modest increases were seen in the figure of the female group, to 11% and 5%, respectively.
Furthermore, the proportions of men taking part in Art and Languages classes were 10% and 20%, respectively. These figures were remarkably lower than that of women, at 30& and 45%, respectively. 40 years later, while the percentage of male participants in the two subjects mentioned above rose slightly, the opposite was true for females. Additionally, humanities attracted more women than men in 1960, at 22% for the former and 32% for the latter. The trend was reversed at the beginning of the 21st century with 42% was males as opposed to 23% for females.
- In many countries recently young people have been living far from their parents from the time they began studies or work until they married Do you think there are more advantages or disadvantages of this trend 89
- The bar chart shows information about fiction book sales from 2006 to 2010 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 93
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8448378957 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1110509602 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117479666336 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421848047381 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347423403499 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796202990325 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038193107161 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.