Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion

tend toward the viewpoint that we should take wildlife conservation into account more seriously, I would have to support a limited number of species protected.
On the one hand, some people think that all wild animals should be protected. The main reason behind this view is that all of them play an important role in the ecosystem. Should there be one of these animals extinct, then the ecosystem might be unbalanced, and it may result in a catastrophic effect on the environment. Moreover, it is believed that all animals are important and should be equally treated. To clarify, protect some selected animals may lead to some others’ extinction.
On the other hand, there are a plethora of compelling reasons why we should focus on protecting only a certain number of wild animals. Firstly, overpopulation of wild animals could be a threat to our existence. In other words, some animals are danger to human life and resources. Kangaroo, case in point, its overpopulation caused so many troubles beyond control that kangaroo meat is encouraged for human consumption. The second reason is that conserving animals requires a large amount of money while these funds can be allocated for humanity issues instead, as many countries are struggling against Covid-19 pandemic or starvation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be reasonable to support wildlife conservation because of its effect on the ecosystem. Having said that, I personally agreed with the idea of protecting a limited number of wild species.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tend
tend toward the viewpoint that we should tak...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, while, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14112903226 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89748255852 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3197948178 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0769230769 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422096223638 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155702403637 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111364372801 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21508312788 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156408611734 0.056905535591 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.