People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages There is a growing trend that people who have to work abroad would take their family along with them While there are some signi

People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
There is a growing trend that people who have to work abroad would take their family along with them. While there are some significant challenges to deal with, I personally believe that the drawbacks are outweighed by the merits.
The main difficulty that each person has to cope with when moving a new country is culture shock. Different norms and the attitude of local citizens may cause a sense of isolation, which is likely to make the adaptation more challenging in the first place. Either the African or the Asian have been struggled with racism once migrating to a Western country although this practice is prohibited and heavily fined. While the adaptation takes much time, foreigners have to deal with nostalgia and the somewhat strange food of the native country. Overseas students from Vietnam, for a typical example, often express they find it hard to adapt to Western flavors whereas it is demanding to find costly Vietnamese traditional food.
Having said that, moving to a new country means having new memorable and valuable experience. Taking a child along with their parents while working in a foreign country is the best opportunity for them to learn a new language while they can enjoy the care from both father and mother. Different experiences in different places with different people can contribute to broad their mind and give them a more profound knowledge about the world. In addition, when migrating to a developed country, the family is more likely to have a better quality of life accompanied with higher incomes. The best universities and hospitals are often located in those countries, so they would have a greater number of choices with regard to either education or healthcare services.
Weighing up both sides of the arguments again, although there are a number of problems that this trend could bring, predominantly culture-related ones, the benefits that it brings to the family are precious.

Many people think that is unnecessary to teach children handwriting skills in this technology ages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been suggested that in this fast-developing world we might prioritise typing over handwritten letters. While there is some truth in the assertation that we are increasingly depending on keyboard, it is not necessarily true that this is at the cost of our handwriting skills.
To begin with, touch-type is undeniably a very useful skill in order to derive substantial benefits from electric devices on a daily basis. What is more, this skill not only helps us to text via social networking sites such as Facebook or Instagram, but it also contributes to the career prospect of the young nowadays. As a result of technology development, mastering Microsoft Office software is a requirement when a graduate applies for a new job.
Having said that, writing by hand is obligatory at most school all around the world. This is because writing skills is linked to grammar as well as spelling and reading skills. Furthermore, students have to sit the exams that require handwriting such as national high school graduation examination. While computers or tablets are much more available in rural areas, it is likely to be unfair if handwriting skills is completely replaced by typing. In Vietnam, for example, students in remote areas are living in poor conditions that they can’t afford any electric devices. A further advantages of practicing writing by hand that is widely believed especially in Eastern countries is that it could increase their level of patience. As a result, this might have a contribution to personality development.
In conclusion, I can see no compelling reason why people should eliminate handwriting skills away from school. Granted, online-learning is becoming increasingly ubiquitous during the Covid-19 pandemic, but it shouldn’t mean that we completely rely on technological devices.

Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country, while some think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
The argument whether hosting an international sports event is beneficial for a country has polarized the public. In this essay, I would attempt to shed light on both viewpoint and present my opinion.
To begin with, the proponents argue that such events need a great amount of money that should have been spent on social services such as healthcare or education. This, as a result, would put too much pressure on government budget in terms of spending on infrastructure and new facilities. These newly built amenities might not even be reused after the event, which is totally a waste. A further issue is that a lot of resources will be allocated for crucial support in every part of the event. For example, for 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo, there are about eighty thousand volunteers working tirelessly to ensure everything go as planned.
Having said that, one big plus from being the host country of an international sports event is that it is the chance to promote nation branding. It will contribute to enhance the position and prestige of the country in the international arena while attracting more tourists in case the event is successful organized. What is more, public awareness of the importance of sporting activities would be increased as well. Regarding facilities built for the event, government should come up with solutions to make use of them. Korea is a typical example of reusing these kinds of sport amenity. Either the stadiums or sport centres which are built for 1988 Olympic Games was refurbished for other purposes such as exhibition or sport museum.
Weighing both sides of the argument again, I am of the opinion that the benefits of hosting an international sport event outweighs the drawbacks. Although it would be somewhat costly, especially for developing countries, the long-term benefits are precious.

In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy. What are the causes? What can be done to address this situation?