The charts and table illustrate the amount of money that families earned and spent on food and clothes in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
In general, the total income and spending on food and clothes followed different trends in the period shown on the table. Besides, there were slight changes in the rates of groups, including food, drinks, and clothes.
It is apparent that the total income experienced a considerable decline between 2010 and 2013, from 29,000 pounds to 25,000 pounds. In contrast, the amount of money that families consumed to buy food and clothes noticeably increased to 15,000 pounds.
In addition, it can obviously be seen that spending on fruits and vegetables significantly grew, and gained the first rank, with 20% in 2010, compared to 35% in 2013, whereas the expenditure on fish and meat dropped to the 4th rank in 2013, with 15%. The consumption of dairy products rose by 5% in the period shown. Furthermore, families settling in the UK tended to spend more money on clothes from 2010 to 2013, up from 12% to 22%, while the spending on other food and drinks stayed the same.
- The maps below show a plan of the city in 1950 and at the present 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48060510616 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5046128926 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318188113174 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130025087443 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980448037315 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199034317016 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768421915054 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.