The bar chart provides a comparison of investments made by five different organizations in machinery, building, staff training, and research.
Overall, organization B spends a higher budget than the others, whereas organizations D and E’s spending is the least remarkable. Additionally, the investing pattern of organization C is the most distinct from the remaining ones.
When comparing organizations A and B, it can be effortlessly observed that each of them allocates more than €1 billion for machinery, construction, and research, with the former investing the highest amount of budget expended on building among five organizations, around €1,3 billion, and the latter spending the most on training its workers, roughly €1,9 billion, which makes organization B become a dominant investor in this category. In addition, machinery was the least invested sector, with €1 billion and €0,9 billion, respectively.
When it comes to organizations D and E, the largest investment goes to the building sector, with each devoting 1 billion, while funding for research hits the lowest, at €0,6 billion and 0,7 billion. With regard to organization C, however, the higest fund is for machinery and research, approximately €1,3 billion each, while the figure for building is lower, roughly €1 billion, about €0,2 higher than employees training
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 92
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64563106796 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15479084097 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.240684086 43.030603864 259% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.142857143 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126525063076 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733088832 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563154230183 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095665059405 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533990417944 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.