The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart below indicates the total volume and quality of water distributed to two geographical regions of the globe Australia and South East Asia between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, It can be seen that quantity, as well as standard of water, is more and better in Australia than South East Asia.
Firstly, considering the year 1990, It is clear that in terms of both the latter criteria Australia is ahead of South East Asia. The amount of water delivered was 80%, at the same time, It was 39% in South East Asia. Whereas, In 2010, water supply was almost 100% in latter state; further, It was nearly 86% in South East Asia.
On the other hand, In the year 1990, the degree of cleanliness in the kangaroo capital was 65% and 40% in Asia. Moreover, the same rise to more than 80% in Australia. But, looking at the graph it can be understood that clean water was still the major issue in South East Asia with numbers going down to below 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree and employer s reasons for hiring them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree 67
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Example 9You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man f 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51744186047 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22080086072 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8536052055 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820013825641 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413699693323 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484234386312 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643744895046 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531096964228 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.