Some people think that the government should control the supply of fresh water as it is limited source While others it should not be regulated Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government should control the supply of fresh water as it is limited source. While others, it should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

According to statement, some individuals consider that legal authorities should use to pass strict laws in regard to prohibit excess usage of fresh water. However, others believe that, it should not be regulated and become free of cost. From my prospective, former views is more supportive and couple of views are explained in forthcoming paragraphhs.
It is worth considering that, water is limited souce of nature. Due to which, legal communities should use to restrict utilisation in excess because of some reasons. First and foremost is water scarcity. In present era, usage of fresh water is proliferate in all sections ans also essential source for all living things. Due to which, people tend to use it in unlimited manner. Thus, which leads to wastage of water and its shortage. Therefore, legal ministers should impose charges on usage of fresh water which results to its limitation of usage. Hence, this leads to preservation of water.
On contrast, other masses and I personally consider that, there should not be restriction of charges on utilisation of water due to plenty of reasons. Firstly, the essential and basic necessity regards to daily basis of life. Because, water play prominent role for regulation of body of living things. Due to which, their physical and metabolism function practices become able to regulate. Instead, scientists also prove that, sufficient intake of water promote improvement in concentration and memorisation of body. Thus, there should not be prohibition on water to fulfill basic necessities. Furthermore, another major factor leads toward under poverty line residents. In this criteria, these masses are earned from labour practices and have low wages of income. Due to which, their budget is not sufficient to afford water on high expenses which results to malnutrition and dehydration. Thus, individulas become leads toward numerous diseases due to low immune system tendency. Therefore, there should not be any control on usage of water.
To recapitulate, acording to my outlook, although due to water scarcity like issues, legal communities should impose control on water utilisation. Whereas, water plays crucial role and its deficinency reveal negative impact on lives of masses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-24 Sandhu Deep 73 view
2022-02-24 Sandhu Deep 67 view
Essays by user Sandhu Deep :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... not be prohibition on water to fulfill basic necessities. Furthermore, another major factor lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...toward under poverty line residents. In this criteria, these masses are earned from ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to water'
Suggestion: to water
...heir budget is not sufficient to afford water on high expenses which results to malnu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1044, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not be any control on usage of water. To recapitulate, acording to my outlook,...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37606837607 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83284019377 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3483642039 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263294105235 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078366788749 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692600300238 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174855536719 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404206470439 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.