When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of our society, intensive new technology emerges. While some people feel reluctant to try new technological devices as soon as they become available, I actually want to buy and try them right away.
Admittedly, figuring out how to operate a new device on one’s own could be time-consuming. Nowadays, students, for example, have already been occupied with heavy academic burdens, like doing experiments, preparing the presentations, and writing the thesis. Especially for those who want to go to work after graduation, they have to spend considerable time taking part-time jobs to earn the experiences for the future. Leaning a brand new device from zero, as a result, may not be able to fit in their relatively tight schedule. On the other hand, new devices are always there to make our life more efficient. Once we learn how to take advantage of this new technology, abundant time may be saved in the long run, and we can actually put more effort into something more crucial to ourselves.
Moreover, exploring a new device can ease my pressure. When dealing with something really complicated, it is often the case that we got entangled and trapped by those difficulties for a substantially long time. There is no wonder that some people will be absent-minded now and then and they actually don’t perform at their best. However, discovering a new device will channel our focus to something more relaxing and meaningful. The success along the way will also enable us to be more confident about the problems we face.
Additionally, the discovery process can serve as a way to escape from daily routine and enhance our imagination. When facing something unfamiliar, we have to be creative and dig into the deep connections between the knowledge we already know and the new technology. One of my personal experiences can serve as an example to illustrate that. When I first encountered a three-dimension printer in junior high, I have no hesitation to try it immediately in the lab. At first, I barely know anything about the structure, the design, the material, and the coding, and no one in the school knows exactly how to perform it either. However, I devoted my full energy to it and finally made the first item, even if it was just a cube. Along this process, I gradually learned how to view the situations from the whole and know how to perform the abstract knowledge and guidelines in real life.
In conclusion, I advocate trying the brand new technological devices as soon as possible because of the efficiency, the relaxation and the imagination they will bring.
- Whether to take a gap year? 90
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 1 help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics 2 help people who cannot afford to build or 72
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students(age14-18)improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1)Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teac 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96567505721 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94359950621 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553775743707 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8085689521 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8095238095 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171525321435 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521081652824 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478952251836 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110045947824 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651491205543 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.