The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country's development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is appreciated that the governor should allocate more to teaching science-based subjects compared to others for the sake of national development and progress. From my perspective, I completely agree with this opinion. This essay would pen down valid justifications behind my verdict.
Initially, I opine that spending the public purse on science lessons would exert a positive impact on students’ cognitive development and logical thinking, thus contributing to a better future workforce. This is mainly derived from the fact that science subjects often require learners to do complicated calculations and explain complex processes, which sharpens their minds and boosts the speed of reactions to the surrounding environment. Should science-based subjects be overlooked, students will not possess both indispensable knowledge and traits to be in the labour force and devote to the national prosperity.
Besides, I hold a strong belief that teaching science subjects should be governmentally funded more as they are the basis of technological development, which is the driving force of many important industries. This is mainly due to the fact that technology is wholly developed from basic science, such as maths and biology. For example, Python, a well-known programming language is based on a host of algorithms. Therefore, pouring governmental funds into teaching science-based subjects would do wonders for industrial development in particular and national development in general. By contrast, if teaching science subjects were not funded, a nation would not witness any technological advancement.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that the country leaders should invest more in teaching science-based subjects to benefit the national development and progress as these subjects would nurture a potential workforce and contribute to developing imperative industries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | ernchawla | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-09 | maninder.vadhrah1988@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 84
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 78
- The chart below shows changes in exporting goods in a country in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ts should be governmentally funded more as they are the basis of technological dev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87096774194 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32958898651 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4435722167 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324817835544 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119271359369 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108034876934 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220109758968 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716972120926 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.