Some people think it is more important for the government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people consider that it is more essential for the authority to pay out public money on advertising a balanced lifestyle to avoid sickness rather than spend on the cure for ready-ill people. Although promoting a healthy lifestyle is vital, it is undeniable that treating illness is not less crucial.
On the one hand, spending money on advertising for a healthy lifestyle to prevent diseases is totally necessary. It will help humans, especially youngsters to comprehend more about the detrimental effects of unbalanced life. Indeed, owing to the convenience and low price of ready-meals, customers are now inexorably increasing leading to a host of related diseases such as obesity, diabetes mellitus… Besides, sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in contemporary society that has an adverse bearing on humans like the higher rate of heart attacks.
On the other hand, it is also crucial for the authority to support finance for treating ready-ill people. Firstly, many children were born with congenital diseases, however, they cannot be cured due to their underprivileged condition which causes long-lasting torments or several thousand deaths per year. As a consequence, they will be deprived of opportunities to live as a normal person. Moreover, searching for treating methods for ill people can boost the development of both domestic and international medicine.
In conclusion, while the potential benefits of promoting a healthy lifestyle make it seem like a good idea, I believe that the government should pay for curing ready-ill people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | vttphuong.d19 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | thadsha1999 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today What are the causes of illiteracy in the modern world and what effects does it have on the people and on society as a whole 56
- Some people say that history can teach us many important values and lessons but others think it is unnecessary to learn from the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think it is more important for the government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of unbalanced life. Indeed, owing to the convenience and low price of ready-m...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like the higher rate of heart attacks. On the other hand, it is also crucial fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should pay for curing ready-ill people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48760330579 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05548266542 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2083328388 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276219538835 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109776354403 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938693787716 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174487261809 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921851345781 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.