Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Living in the urbanization and modernization era, a variety of nations have a tendency to emphasize industrial professions and downplay the essence of the agricultural field which leads to the import of a tremendous of food around the world. It is debatable that this action has an adverse bearing on both the government and its inhabitants. To a certain extent, this issue would do beneficiaries and disservice simultaneously to the importers.
On one hand, it is undeniable that there are vigorous reasons for nations to establish the food import trade. First and foremost, those countries whose natural resources are depleted, inadequate, or merely inappropriate for food production, can take advantage of buying in food to diminish the depletion. As a consequence of the trade process, the number of expenditure and time is saved for allocation to industrialization and modernization. Japan, for example, is renowned for being a prosperous nation and a thriving economy that its land is unsuitable for cultivation. To confront the difficulty, it prefers to import rice instead so that it can focus on more pivotal fields such as technology.
On the other hand, reclamation is in utter need that it is better for some nations to invest in food provision. It is advisable for them to be self-sufficient, especially, when it comes to crises or recession. Moreover, as the export countries adjust the policies about a tax hike, both the importers' government and its dwellers are put a strain to deal with the increase in food price that residents may work harder to meet the consumption demand.
In conclusion, besides the aforementioned benefits, the drawbacks pertain to tax and its policies need to be taken into account when nations import a significant number of food commodities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 56 | view |
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 84
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 73
- The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'importers'' or 'importer's'?
Suggestion: importers'; importer's
...the policies about a tax hike, both the importers government and its dwellers are put a s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19031141869 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27129279415 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2858952886 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15155694069 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529591697602 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359775627707 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905616539052 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198131529621 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'importers'' or 'importer's'?
Suggestion: importers'; importer's
...the policies about a tax hike, both the importers government and its dwellers are put a s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19031141869 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27129279415 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2858952886 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15155694069 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529591697602 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359775627707 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905616539052 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198131529621 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.