Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Many would bolster that government officials should rely on their own judgments rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people who they serve. In some sense, it is true that carrying personal epiphany and not following tasks unquestionably are conducive to better resolution. Yet, I still believe that government officials should follow the rules strictly, and they should not rely on their personal opinions. I would like to say the limitations of own judgments in terms of precarious and obscured outcomes.
Of course, people who are in favor of this topic would say carrying out their tasks without officials’ credence can be deleterious. For example, during World War II, numerous Jewish were decimated from foul belief, and officers conducted abysmal actions without considering and censoring their ideas. This implies the contemptive impact to citizens when government officials follow the rules without deliberating their opinions and purpose.
Notwithstanding precedent acrid historical figure, it does not necessarily mean that relying on own judgment rather than carrying out the will of the people who they serve is always right in terms of daily lives. In terms of mundane lives, the example is an anachronism when the war is compared to contemporary lives. World War II was an absolutely abnormal anecdote, and the possibility of cataclysm is minute. As a result, within daily lives, it is a primacy to follow and strict on the rules, which the society is already promised, because it means we agreed upon to follow. However, once own judgment intervenes and messes around the promises, it brings apprehensive side effects. Even though governments officials do not need to follow the rules without any doubt, the rules need to be kept hard. If they feel uneasiness and need to impugn, then they can plead following procedures.
In addition, the problem of own judgment can be discussed in another sense. With regard to citizens’ confusion, several side-effects seem limpid. For example, let’s assume that there is one police officer who serves locally, and the officer likes to give a speed ticket solely based on their own judgment. So, the officer always has given the tickets to people who Overspeed 10 miles in town while the officer is generous when drivers speed 30 miles more on the highway because the officer regards driving in town requires wary attention. In this case, without consistent policies, citizens would be confounded, and even start not to trust the rules which society and community have created.
To sum up, despite the disdainful side-effects from World War II example, officers should not rely on their own judgment daily lives. Instead, officers should still be mindful and care about all tasks they perform; and if an inflammatory incident occurs, they need to amend through the procedures, not from their own judgment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 79
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 66
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 59
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not following tasks unquestionably are conducive to better resolution. Yet, I s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, of course, as a result, it is true, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23060344828 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74190026361 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519396551724 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2481063994 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404651081786 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11971108494 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157988282959 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239073606375 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148796899917 0.0667264976115 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.