The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the proprotion of waster consumed for three different feilds in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia.
Overall, it is clear that, the amount of water use in agricultural in South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia was highest, whereas the percentage of water used in other two purposes accounted for small number.
The amount of water used in Agricultural Use accounted for highest percentage in Central Asia, at 88%, compare with 84% in Africa. In south East Asia and South America, the proportion of water in Agricultural Use made up largest percentage, at 81% and 71%, respectvely. The percentage of water used in Domestic was similar in Central Asia and South East Asia, at 7%, compared with the highest figure in South America, about 19%.
In North America and Europe, Induatrial have largest perercentage of water used, at 48% and 53%, respectively. In contrast, in South America, Africa and Central Asia used water in Industrial at lowest rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foregin country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 67
- It is difficult for people living in cities today get enough physical exercise Why is this the case What can be done to solve the problem 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these view and give 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65742415022 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458823529412 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6448519447 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127854971588 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821422720717 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411869924889 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096198740562 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341756835438 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.