TOPIC: Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Opinions differ when it comes to organizing a worldwide competition for athletics. While it is true that this action brings some detrimental effects to the host nations to some extent, I believe that it is more important in terms of the country's renown.
Opposers of a country hosting an international sport event can point out that too much value is placed on sports. Host nations have to spend a significant amount of their budget to invest in the facilities. Human resources are put to work under great pressure for the event preparation process as well. Take the preparation of Qatar for the World Cup 2022 as an example. They spent an inordinate amount of money to hold this event. According to New Magazines, the cost for the stadium construction and renovation is up to 115 billion dollars. In addition, nearly 5000 workers were thoroughly exhausted due to overwork for a long time. Many well-known football players supposed that the action of Qatar government diminished the value of sport and then they spurned to join the WC 2022.
Despite the disadvantages mentioned above, I believe that the universal sport contest brings greater benefits to the host countries because it helps to gain their reputation. It is true that the sport event draws enormous crowds worldwide. The locations of the sport competition become the topic of global discussion as well as the headlines of the newspapers. During the event, their images and culture are broadcast over the mass media of other countries. People from all over the world come to the host nations to support their national teams which makes a valuable contribution to the growth of tourism. Therefore, they stand a great chance of introducing their country to entire globe.
In conclusion, host nations can notably benefit from their sport event organization. However, the authorities should take pecuniary issues into consideration to achieve best outcomes.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 67
- TOPIC Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'achieve the best'.
Suggestion: achieve the best
... pecuniary issues into consideration to achieve best outcomes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12420382166 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7978264371 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7493026906 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3888888889 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244594848923 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657541273093 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456769027642 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13468722636 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442036953464 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.